1. Gratis Nedlasting Election Games 2012 For Mac Download

On Sunday, September 23, the Maldives will hold a national election that has observers concerned about the country’s direction. The “island nation,” an archipelago of around 1,200 islands in the middle of the Indian Ocean, stands on a major fault line between democracy and authoritarianism.

The country’s president, Abdulla Yameen Abdul Gayoom—often described as a “” or “”—has pulled the country backward on the path to democracy. As Human Rights Watch puts it, “Increasingly autocratic measures by the Maldives presidentwho took office following a disputed election in 2013, are eroding fundamental human rights in the island country, including freedom of association, expression, peaceful assembly, and political participation.” More on: As important, the Maldives sits at the heart of Indian Ocean geopolitics. It is often described as a “battleground” for influence between China and India. The Maldives has historically retained close ties with India but in recent years has grown more enmeshed with China as a result of China’s infrastructure financing.

Such methods of infrastructure financing have led to a dramatic increase in the national debt, as in other South Asian countries like Sri Lanka and Pakistan. As a Center for Global Development in-depth analysis notes, “the country is considered by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund to be at a high risk of debt distress due to its vulnerability to exogenous shocks.” What’s more, a recent investigative report from the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project chronicled widespread corruption in the country linked to deals leasing islands for tourism. And, of course, hovering in the background of all these political problems is the existential question of climate change, sea level rise, and the Maldives’ future. In advance of Sunday’s vote, here are a few readings to provide in-depth background on the crises this country faces. More on:. Human Rights Watch: “”. Human Rights Watch: “”.

Wall Street Journal: “”. The Guardian: “”.

Al Jazeera: “”. Center for Global Development: “” (especially pages 14-17). Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project: “”. United Nations Development Programme: “” My book about India’s rise on the world stage, was published by Oxford University Press in January. Follow me on Twitter:.

Or like me on Facebook or Instagram.

For elections and policies. For elections and policies. For chairperson and policies. For representative councils,. To start and fund one time. New for agencies and departments.

New for teaching and research. Key: = common plurality rule's erratic flip flops. = better one-winner rules such as Instant Runoff Voting.

= Condorcet rules for a central and broadly-popular winner. = Single Transferable Vote for fairly distributed winners. = Loring Ensemble Rules for a centrally-balanced council. This easy-to-use software for the best voting rules makes democratic decisions faster, easier and more accurate.

It leads to better councils, policies and budgets for schools, clubs, coops, unions, companies and towns. It strengthens civil society and shames politicians who refuse to modernize public decision making. Tallies must avoid corruption and assure voters that their ballots are faithfully counted. Therefore the public has long had a right to observe the tally process in as much detail as possible.

For tallies involving software, that right has to include inspection of the software code. So a healthy democracy requires “ open source software.” OSS programs have priority on this list. Programmers who adapt some code from an open source program are obliged to salute the work they build on and make their own code available for others. This site develops free voting tools to elect centrally- balanced councils, enact central policies, and allocate fair-share funding for projects and agencies. A dozen sites listed here offer software to tally Condorcet or PR rules. Those programs can be combined to create centrally- balanced councils. All these sites distinguish themselves from the hundreds that give away little more than hot air in political rumors or self-serving opinions.

A group can test drive a new rule in a survey. Or they can turn into a “committee of the whole” to vote, tally and report the result to enact by the usual rules. Hand Tallies For groups with 10 to 100 voters: A quick show of hands can tally most rules to decide elections or policies for about 100 voters. (Voters might be easier to count if they are able to move into “preference groups”.) Hand counting paper ballots is easy for a tally with a few dozen votes.

But some of the best Condorcet and STV rules cannot be hand counted. Is usually best for enacting one policy and sometimes to select a list of projects. Each voter grades or ranks most proposals on the ballot (A, B, C, or 1st, 2nd, 3rd.) In a hand-tally process, one person enters tick marks in a Pairwise table while two or three people read aloud a ballot's preferences and confirm the tick marks.

If ballots include the option ' Fund no more.' The tally can show which projects have majority support. FairVote explains of ballot papers for takes some care. But these hand tallies have elected reps in Australia and Ireland and in private organizations for almost 100 years. STV is a form of Proportional Representation. STVAction offers to help some steps in a hand count. The teaches small groups to use paper cards for quick votes.

It offers the best rules for budgets, reps and projects. Ballot Data-Entry Forms Most of the tally programs below can read ballot data typed into a plain text file. A simple spreadsheet to check accuracy can help the data entry clerks. The Australian Capital Territory's uses personal computers as voting terminals linked to a server in each polling location using a secure local area network.

The ballot, server, and tally programs were written by Software Improvements, Free, Open source, in C, 2004. The Open Voting Foundation advocates public observation of vote counting.

They say tallies by proprietary hidden software make public observation impossible. Promotes adoption of open source voting. The New Haven Advocate has an excellent for a mock U.S. Presidential election 2007. In JavaScript, © 2007. The Smithsonian Museum of American History from the 1800s to 2012. Let each user enter their own ballot.

But online voting, like mail-in ballots, is susceptible to vote buying, and possible pressure on voters from friends, family and bosses. Online voting if also subject to hacking.

Application includes multi-winner rules, so it is listed there. Application also includes multi-winner rules, so it is listed there.

LeGrand's can tally 15 single-winner voting rules: Baldwin, Black, Borda, Bucklin, Carey, Combs, Copeland, Dodgson, Hare (Instant Runoff), Nanson, Raynaud, Schulze method (Beat Path), Simpson, Small, and Tideman's Ranked Pairs. You can find a series of winners for a multi-winner election or selection of projects by using the option to 'Enter candidates to ignore.' The tally reports the first winner when no one is ignored, the second is the winner when the first winner is ignored, etc. One page briefly, and another. Free, Open source in JavaScript. Save the page on your disk if you want to run tallies offline. Condorcet Internet Voting Service, CIVS, is a free Internet voting service from Cornell University.

Blake Cretney offers three programs and their source code at SourceForge: tallies more than a dozen one-winner rules including the Schulze method (Beat Path), Borda, IRV, Minmax, and Tideman's Ranked Pairs. It is intended to run on any computer with the Python language installed. (Python is free to download and the VoteEngine code is very easy to read.) Free, Open source in Python, © 2000. RPVote tallies Ranked Pairs, arguably the best Condorcet- completion rule. The Windows version is very easy to download, install and use. The source code for RPVote can be compiled to run on any computer with a C compiler.

Free, Open source in C, © 2001. RPWeb tallies Ranked Pairs online. Was designed and built in the MIT Media Lab in the Computing Culture group. The team includes Courtland Allen, C. Scott Ananian, John Dong, Benjamin Mako Hill, Justin Sharps and Alyssa Wright. “Voting machinery for the masses!” Schulze Method, Online voting and talllies, Copyleft 2006-2010, Open source available, in Ruby. Brian Olson can tally 15 single-winner voting rules: Borda, Bucklin, Combs, Instant Runoff, Schulze (Beat Path), Tideman (Ranked Pairs) and a Normalized Ratings rule similar to.

Copyrighted, free for non-commercial use; in Java, some in C, C or Perl. Jochen Voss wrote to tally the Schulze method as used to set policies at Debian.

Free, Open source, 2008, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Offers an in PERL 5, Free Open source, GNU Revision 1.1 1996. And Revision 0.1.0, Free Open source, in PHP.

Eric Gorr offers for MiniMax, Beatpath and Ranked Pairs.; Free, Open source in C. Michael Clarkson, Stephen Chong and Andrew Myers, of the Cornell University Computer Science Dept. Have built a. The completion rules include Schulze, CIVS Ranked Pairs, Maximize Affirmed Majorities, and CIVS Condorcet Runoff which is the same as. The programming language is not specified. NOT open source. Offers a 'Voting Methods Calculator' to accompany Mathematics Beyond the Numbers by Gilbert and Hatcher.

It tallies simple plurality, plurality with runoff, Borda count and Condorcet. In Java NOT open source.

Taylor offers which 'implements a variety of single-seat election systems.' Approval, Black, Borda, Condorcet, Dodgeson, IRV, Nansen, Smith set, Young.

Free, Open source (GNU) in Pascal. Last modified. Tally Borda, Condorcet, IRV or plurality with a from David Lovelock; Department of Mathematics; University of Arizona; Tucson, Arizona. A stable DOS program with simple menus.

Copies may be found in the. Free, version 1.01 © 1992-1993. Archived for this voting program. Stephen Checkoway of ucsd.edu offers Free, Open source in Python, © 2011, All rights reserved. Alan Johnsrud developed a voting rule from his work in war game simulations which model as a matrix of vectors. A candidate gets points for each rival she beats, more points for besting a strong rival, fewer for defeating a weak one who wins few comparisons. Free, Open source for QBasic © 2000.

Lucien Saumur offered a, 'Voting machine with tools for preferential ballots and Condorcet tallies. A copy is in the. Coded in Visual Basic 3 © 1996. All of these voting tools tally single- and multi-winner elections. STV is commonly known as Alternative Vote, Choice Voting, Hare rule, Instant Runoff, Preference Vote or Ranked-Choice Voting in various countries. And others programmed to tally most versions of STV including ERS97 and Meek.

It also tallies several Condorcet rules: IRV on Smith Set, Borda on Smith Set, and Schulze on Schwartz Set. $5 for individuals, $99 for non-profits with less than 30 employees, to $999 for companies and large non-profits, Open source in Python; installs on MS Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux; GNU © 2011.

The last free version is easy to find by searching for “OpenSTV 1.6” or “OpenSTV 1.7”. There is a simple and free web service that uses OpenSTV: developed ChoicePlus™ Pro primarily to tally STV elections. It is used by the city of Cambridge Massachusetts. It was $15,000, but the newest version, 2.3.4, “is yours to use free of charge, but with no support.” It is open source in Java, © 1993-2009. PRMaster was an earlier version.

They offer ChoicePlus Lite, it tallies up to 500 candidates and 5000 voters and includes STV, Borda, Condorcet, and Cumulative rules. Proprietary code in C for Windows, © 2000. Jonathan Lundell worked on, and has started “”, a Python-based package for STV tallies. It compliments his website. The design can make it easy to add new versions of STV and new user interfaces.

V0.8; © 2010, GNU General Public License v3. (He offered online tallies by the Droop, Meek or Warren methods in, but cautions it is now deprecated.

Open source in PERL © 2004-2007, all rights reserved.) by tallies multi winner rules: CPO-STV, CFPRM, and D'Hondt (without lists); Condorcet rules: Dodgson, Simpson, Tideman, Copeland, and Schulze; and older single winner rules: plurality, Borda, Hare, and Nanson. It is Open source, written in C; an initial version, Spring 2005.

The Australian Capital Territory's used personal computers as voting terminals linked to a server in each polling location using a secure local area network. The ballot, server, and tally programs were written by Software Improvements, and were Free, Open source, in C, 2004. Joe Otten and the offered with clear menus for easy use.

It included the ERS97 version of STV. It was free: The trial version was for non-commercial use and was limited to 12 candidates and 60 voters. A version for 50 candidates and 1000 voters was available and required registration with ERS. Windows (32bit), Proprietary code in Delphi (Object Pascal for Windows), © 2000.

(Note: their server often does not respond.) Lee Naish offers a program to tally with a thousand ballots and over ten candidates. It is Free, Open source, coded in NU-Prolog 1996-97. The Institute of Mathematical Statistics uses STV to elect its board and offers an written in the very high-level programming language of the statistical package S-Plus; Free, Open source; 2002.

Cambridge University students programmed to tally the Newland- Britton version of STV, which they use at Cambridge. Free, Open source in Java; 2001. Wichmann wrote MEEK and published it in ' co-authored by D. Woodall in the Computer Journal of the British Computer Society 30 No. Slight modifications were made later by T. Nicolaus Tideman. MEEK allows for up to 40 candidates and an unspecified number of voters, as long as the product of the number of candidates times (1 plus the average number of preferences specified by voters) is less than 20,000.

Free, Open source, in Pascal, © 1987 (updated 2000) A more recent version may be available from the authors. (Note: The link above is to the web archive because it is no longer available at the British Computer Society web site.) tallies the same voting rules as PoliticalSim but without menus for research, demonstrations or games. It uses uncommon terms and options. Macintosh and Windows, Free, Open source in Excel 4 through Excel 2001, © 1991-2000. Is 'intended to make implementations of voting systems freely available in Java.' Roy Ward has programmed Meek's version of STV: version 0.4, Summer 2002.

Hans Aberg offered, to tally Voting By Priorities, his blend of STV with the greatest remainder list-PR rule. It uses a new quota and can use Meek's vote transfer method for STV. Macintosh (could be compiled for Windows), free, Open source in C, © 1997. New Zealand wrote a program to tally Meek's STV for cities and towns that vote to use it. It is not available to other organizations. It is now proprietary code, in Visual Basic 6.0, and is © 2002.

Dr Mark Porter BSc FRCA STV for Macintosh in C 1996. An site had an online STV ballot and tally limited to 5 candidates. pages and software have disappeared.

Any online or mail-in voting system is susceptible to vote buying, and possible pressure on voters from their family, friends and bosses. Online voting has added the risk of hacking attacks. Online voting is inherently less secure than online banking and commerce – whose managers often can detect and mitigate small frauds and big cyberattacks because each customer’s account has a unique ID. A company can review the record of a customer’s data as it went through each step in a transaction. But most voting depends on anonymous, secret ballots.

So each ballot must not have an identifiable, tracable voter, which would expose how Bob voted and how each vote on his ballot moved through the tally process. In contrast, paper ballots have high degrees of both anonymity and security if they are guarded properly. Most jurisdictions scan their paper ballots so computers can tally the data – and so other computers can recheck those tallies. Brad Beattie offers, with online preference ballots that allow tied ranks and write-in candidates. It tallies Schulze STV, Schulze PR or “Non-proportional ordering”. His includes Schulze's Condorcet completion method. It is written in Python, Free, Open source, © 2009-2012.

Civinomics has prototype and tallies online. “.soon, anyone will be able to set up ranked choice voting polls or ballots on Civinomics.” Retrieved September, 2015.

Dave Robinson offers with online preference ballots (with no ties allowed) and online tallies using. You can setup public or private polls for free.

It works on web-enabled mobile devices and on facebook. It is written in Python, VBScript and PHP. Free, Open source, GNU © 2001-2012. Put OpenSTV online as It can tally most versions of STV including ERS97 and Meek. It also tallies several Condorcet rules: IRV on Smith Set, Borda on Smith Set, and Schulze on Schwartz Set. $5 for individuals, $99 for non-profits with less than 30 employees, to $999 for companies and large non-profits.

Craig Simon moved his website to facebook, so it requires users to share their “basic information” with the ballot system. Offers a with an online form for entering in 1 ballot at a time. Ties cannot be entered in this bubble form. Open source in JavaScript; GNU AGPL © 2009.

Designed to tally the Single Transferable Vote with Droop quota and fractional transfers. The online ballot allows no tied votes. An election with 100 voters costs $200; one with 1000 voters costs $500.

Says they can provide transparent and secure elections services online. Proprietary code; free for up to 100 voters. (E1C) offers online elections and surveys that handle ranked ballots. Proprietary code.

“FairVote has partnered with E1C to run private sector elections.”, of New Zealand, offers an online STV demo This software elects the board of the Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd, a US$6.8 billion company. You must request a login PIN in advance to run a demo., of Prague offers its own kind of Cumulative Voting. It was originally intended to fill two seats by giving each voter a ballot allowing four votes, one of which may be a negative vote against a candidate. Tools for has allocated budgets for projects by Movable Money Votes. The community’s board of directors set the final budgets, based on voting by members, tallied with software written by Dr.

Robert Tupelo-Schneck. (His method for Fair-share Spending can work with departmental budgets also.) He tested it with ballots and results from the Electoral Reform Society and other sources. Based on, the tally was written in Python and was an open-source project at. You can to run in Python on your own computer. His new version is entirely rewritten in Java.

His newest is written in JavaScript. Simulation and Tally: This simulation of fair-share spending lets users play with election data and see its results all on a 'neighborhood map.'

The Excel file tallies 25 voters and 16 project proposals. Version 2.1, January 2009, 524K.

This version tallies Movable Money Votes based on 'voting cards'. The uses cards as a physical analogy. It helps voters understand the logic and welcome a computer's help with a large tally.

Older versions: 320K, 280K. 2009 The lower-resolution version of this may work better on older computers. Version 2.0, June 2006, 66K. There is also an older simulation of based on the method.

Version 1.2, August 2004, 133K. The page on offers several Excel ballots and tally programs for selecting projects and setting their budgets. Tools for Dr. Schneck's is fun and easy. It lets a voter click or drag candidates onto his own list of favorites, then change their ranks by dragging them up or down his list. Fair-share Spending needs the voters to rank the candiddates just once. The budget-setting programs below need the voters to adjust their ballots several times, causing and countering budget changes.

Gratis Nedlasting Election Games 2012 For Mac Download

Excel spreadsheets often work in, which is free for computers with Windows, Macintosh OS-X or Linux. To use the online versions at Google, write to You may download the Excel version to change the department names and current budgets. Then upload it to use on the Web in your own Google account. Or use it through a local network where you can give each page a different password. Each spreadsheet is Free, Open source, and © 2007 under a GNU copyright. So you must give credit to the original source: AccurateDemocracy.com.

Each of these four programs has a different way to limit how much one voter may change one department’s budget. The first two are easy for voters; the next two are harder to use and probably no better. A voter grades or ranks departments. The item with the highest grade has the highest utility value. So it gets the maximum grant allowed.

Each lower grade gets a bit less. Online version at Google: August 2007. Lets a voter grant a department as little or as much as he wants up to a maximum. That max is a fraction of its current budget. Some voters like to add the max to as many as they can afford, and add nothing to the other departments. 469KB; 36 voters.nbsp; Online (Google might not allow 36 simultaneous users.) A voter pays no tax to grant a department his share of its current budget. The more he tries to change that 'neutral grant' the more tax he pays.

131KB; 9 voters.: This more sophisticated program lets up to 100 voters use BIP to set ongoing budgets for departments, trade votes and watch the changes as they happen. Instructions for installing the tally sheet and ballots are on ReadMe.doc. Free, Open source in Excel 97, © 2000-2003. For setting more than 50 budgets by taking a series of ballots. The zipped file is about 511KB. For setting less than 50 budgets on a single ballot.

The zipped file is about 440KB. Version 1.0, April 22, 2003. Earlier version for up to 9 voters:.

Excel 5, 290KB. In version 1.2, April 21, 2003.: This program lets up to 9 voters negotiate one-to-one as they adjust agency budgets. The online helps voters pass messages for vote trading.

For Teaching, was the first public program for visual and statistical comparisons, in lectures and research, of two dozen single- and multi-winner voting rules. Free, Open source in Excel, © 1991-1999. Nicky Case offers, “an interactive guide to alternative voting systems.” Free, Open source in Javascript, Public Domain 2016. It simulates only single-winner rules. Its unrealistic distributions of voters make IRV, Condorcet, and Condorcet+IRV behave poorly.

And others have found that sims which spread voters normally or in realistic clumps give IRV a good and Condorcet+IRV the best resistance to manipulation. This guide does not take into account the realistic chances for and effects of. James Marshall offers, a very concise program to explore agents competing for territory in a simple plurality-rule election.

Marshall welcomes users to add more voting rules. Free, Open source in Java 1.0, © 1996. “The big square represents the political positions of the voting public, who are evenly distributed.” This unrealistic distribution makes IRV look bad. Carlton Chai offered a 'Voting Cellular Automata' Vote.java.

It has vanished from the web but a copy is in the. (The Brookings Institution) (University of Chicago) and are 'agent' simulations for exploring patterns in games such as the Prisoner dilemma, Life and Sugarscape. Games involving responsive agents as candidates and voters are possible. These programs require some work to install with Java. All are big, Free, with some Open source in Java. For Teaching The by FairVote shows votes transfer between candidates’ jars. Flash; © 2008.

The by HumanCube shows STV votes transfer between candidates’ bar charts. Very limited ballot input. Shockwave Flash; website © 2008, Human Cube Inc.

An from Ireland shows STV vote transfers between candidates on bar charts. Available or Java; © 1999-2001 Ciaran Quinn. An from Chris Gates shows each step of an IRV tally transferring votes from the weakest candidate to more popular ones. Adobe Flash Player 9. An, as used in New Zealand, shows votes transfer from the weakest candidate to more popular ones. Adobe Flash Player 9. Smith offered a to create random voters (either honest or strategic) then tally their preferences by several one-winner rules: Approval, Borda, Bucklin, Condorcet, Copeland, Coombs, Ranked Pairs, STV by Hare's or Meek's rules (not tested for elections with more than 1 seat).

He also offered a program to calculate of factions on a council. Both are Free, Open source, in C © October 2000. (They were tested only in LINUX and compiled with gcc.) More Downloads This web page downloads a concise 9-page article on the best voting rules.

It is easier to study than the screen version. Updated 98-08-03.